13 Days, 250K in OIG Fines

Posted by Frank Strafford on February 5, 2015 in Industry News, OIG Penalties,

Looks like the OIG means business.

13 Days, 250K in OIG FinesOver the course of the past 13 days, over $250,000 in fines have been meted out due to the alleged employment of excluded individuals.  The first involved a Minnesota pharmacist who owned and managed a pharmacy that participated in Federal health care programs while he was excluded from participating in these programs.  The second involved an Alabama hospital which employed an individual who was excluded from participating in any Federal health care programs.  And the third involved a group home in Arizona, which had employed a nurse who has been excluded from participation in Federal health care programs.

Three different states; three different types of providers; three different fields of employment.

All nailed under the same exclusion mandate.

Points to ponder:

  • The excluded individual at the Alabama facility was identified through ‘a data analysis project initiated by the OIG’s Office of Evaluation and Inspections’.  The OIG post and website make no mention of when, how, and why this data analysis project was launched; nor of how extensive it is, and which providers are earmarked for future data analyses.
  • Penalties extended across several states and types of facilities; nobody appears to be immune.

Employers take note.

About Frank Strafford

About Frank Strafford

Related Articles

NPI Numbers Enhancing the Exclusion Screening ...

May 14, 2021

Last month, the OIG released  audit report findings regarding whether Medicare Part C health plans (also known as Medicare Advantage Organizations or MAOs) are fully utilizing National Provider I...

How Mandatory Exclusions Differ from Permissive ...

January 28, 2015

Do you know the differences between Mandatory and Permissive Exclusions? Mandatory Exclusions, as the name presumes, are compulsory for a five year minimum term, when an individual has committed any o...

Can You Be Paid Post-Exclusion for ...

March 2, 2015

It's generally a fairly simple concept that an entity that hires or contracts an excluded individuals is subject to monetary penalties. But what happens when those lines get a little fuzzier? A bull...