Why One Doctor Just Ended Up on the OIG Exclusion List

Posted by Frank Strafford on March 9, 2015 in Industry News, OIG Penalties,

Anyone working in the field of healthcare human resources should understand the role of the Office of the Inspector General in both investigating fraud related to federal health care programs and penalizing health organizations that hire people placed on the federal exclusion list. Essentially, the OIG compiles a List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) that provides information to health professionals, patients and the public on providers that have been prohibited from participating in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health programs, and this data is available via the OIG database.

Any organization that hires or contracts with someone listed on the federal and state exclusion databases is subject to significant financial penalties, which is why OIG database screening is such an important part of health conduct compliance. In fact, OIG fines for exclusion violations are on the rise, averaging $197,000 per individual. That’s reason enough to consider regular screening a must. But have you ever wondered about Why One Doctor Just Ended Up on the OIG Exclusion Listthe reasons that people end up on the exclusion list in the first place? Only a few days into March, the OIG announced a new agreement that provides a perfect example.

The Offense
Dr. Charles Denham, of Laguna Beach, California, allegedly both solicited and accepted kickbacks between 2008 and 2010. Denham, who operated both a consulting company, Health Care Concepts Inc., and a research organization, Texas Medical Institute of Technology, is a patient safety consultant who co-chaired the Safe Practices Committee of the National Quality Forum at that time. The committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on standardizing practices in healthcare.

Apparently, Denham received monthly payments during his tenure on the committee from CareFusion Corporation and failed to disclose these payments. Prosecutors contended that he sought out these payments in return for promoting the use of a CareFusion product, ChloraPrep, violating the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute and therefore causing fraudulent claims for ChloraPrep to be submitted to federal health programs.

The Settlement
The OIG announced March 2 that Denham had agreed to pay $1 million to settle these allegations. In addition, Denham and both of his businesses will be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid and any other federal health program. “Quality and patient safety must drive medical recommendations,” Inspector General Daniel R. Levinson of the OIG said in a news release. “Doctors that put profits ahead of this core value must be held accountable.”

What do you think of this case? Does knowing more about how some providers land on the exclusion list help you see the value of OIG database screening?

About Frank Strafford

About Frank Strafford

Related Articles

The Fraud That Binds?

June 20, 2016

Just a few months into 2016, and already, a mother-daughter tandem is causing ripples in the health care pond by pleading guilty to second-degree Medicaid fraud in Hawaii last March 9.   The ...

Referrals from Excluded Providers

January 18, 2021

Hospitals and other health care providers typically rely on referrals from community providers as a major source of patients and revenue. The federal Stark and Anti-Kickback laws strictly regulate pro...

OIG’s Top Challenge Remains Medicaid ...

December 3, 2017

OIG Transparency In November, OIG released its 2017 report updating its top management challenges and strategic priorities. The first and second priorities continue to be Medicare and Medicaid program...