Tracking the OIG Exclusion Trends

Posted by Frank Strafford on November 4, 2014 in Industry News,
court opinions
Is the OIG getting even tougher?
Something to think about.  On October 31st, the OIG released its 2015 Work Plan, which, to quote the OIG, “summarizes new and ongoing reviews and activities that OIG plans to pursue with respect to HHS programs and operations during the current fiscal year and beyond.”

What does the OIG have in store for exclusion screening over the course of the next fiscal year?  Plenty.  Here’s a brief quote to chew over – the description of an enhanced watchdog program, brand new for 2015:

Prevent grant awards to individuals and entities who were suspended and/or debarred

We will determine whether HHS operating divisions are taking adequate precautions to ensure that individuals and entities suspended or debarred are not awarded Federal grants or contracts. To protect the Government’s interests, Federal agencies are required to make awards only to responsible sources—those that are determined to be reliable, dependable, and capable of performing required work. One way to protect the Government’s interests is through suspensions and debarments, which are actions taken to preclude firms or individuals from receiving contracts or assistance because of various types of misconduct. A suspension is a temporary exclusion typically pending the completion of an investigation or legal proceeding, while a debarment is for a fixed term that depends on the seriousness of the cause, but generally is for a period of 3 years. These exclusions are reported in the System for Award Management (SAM), maintained by the General Services Administration, along with violations of certain statutes and regulations. A previous report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that some agency programs need greater attention, and governmentwide oversight could be improved. (OAS; W-00-15-59024; expected issue date: FY 2015)

What that means is that an employer can be subject to additional, intensive scrutiny, simply because he or one of his constituents was included in a grant proposal.  This program is being put into place for the first time in 2015, in addition to the OIG’s already-existing watchdog methods…which have made life complicated enough already.

Tougher?  We think so.

On an individual level, the OIG has upped its levels of excluded individuals significantly over the course of the past two years.  Of approximately 60,000 excluded individuals, more than 6% were added to the exclusion list during this past year.  And the numbers of newly-excluded individuals just keep going up.

exclusion

So, is the crackdown on excluded individuals getting worse?  Sure.

Should employers be worried about it?  Well, that all depends on what kind of steps they’ve taken to make sure that they’re always protected.

Please refer to this resource for more helpful information on OIG Exclusions and LEIE searches.

About Frank Strafford

About Frank Strafford

Related Articles

A New Use for the National ...

March 15, 2021

A Brief History of the NPI and NPPES As defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the National Provider Identifier (NPI) is a unique 10-digit, intelligence-free identificatio...

What To Do if You Currently ...

July 8, 2015

    I Found Out I Employed An Excluded Party...Now What? (Understanding Self-Disclosure Protocol)     Discovering that you’ve employed an excluded individual can happen eve...

Updated Guidance on Exclusion Screening ...

February 15, 2023

In January of 2023, New Jersey issued new guidance regarding those databases that healthcare entities (including providers and managed care organizations) participating in NJ’s Medicaid program must...

Understanding OIG Exclusions

OIG Exclusions Screening Process

Exclusion FAQS

Quick OIG Exclusion Basics

Employing Excluded Individuals

Consequences to Employing an Excluded Individual

OIG Compliance Law

Laws and Publications on OIG Compliance

More Compliance Resources

Our Culture

We build the best, so you can perform at your best.

Trusted for Good Reason

  • ✓ Guaranteed accurate
  • ✓ Certified Secure
  • ✓ Audit Proof
  • ✓ Feature-rich reporting
  • ✓ Round the clock real-time-data
  • ✓ Processing fully automated

Security First

  • ✓ Cloud hosted
  • ✓ Encrypted data
  • ✓ Real-time backups

Trusted for Accuracy

  • ✓ Physical security
  • ✓ Restricted access
  • ✓ Single sign-on
  • ✓ Password security
  • ✓ Certified secure
  • ✓ Cross checking

HEALTHCARE ESTABLISHMENTS NATIONWIDE COUNT ON STREAMLINE VERIFY

5

60%

Average workload reduction by implementing the Streamline Verify program

5

10K

Establishments trust Streamline Verify nationwide

5

2011

Serving the healthcare industry’s unique compliance needs since 2011

5

24X

Setting standards with hourly synchronization to primary source data