Understanding OFAC and the 50% Rule

Posted by Joe Stefansky on February 1, 2021 in OFAC,

The U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) is the department of the U.S. Treasury that is responsible for facilitating compliance with the U.S. foreign policy and national security agendas.  OFAC works to bring those involved in narcotics, terrorism, and other undesirable activities that threaten U.S. national security into line. OFAC was created in 1950 in light of the need to sanction China and Korea during the Korean War. OFAC functions within the authority of presidential national emergency powers and related legislation that grants OFAC the ability to establish trade restrictions and block assets as effective means of achieving foreign compliance. For a more detailed overview of OFAC in general see also, our prior blog post on OFAC, Understanding OFAC Administered Sanctions Programs.

According to the law firm of Gibson Dunn’s 2020 annual year end sanctions and annual controls update, OFAC sanctions frequency increased significantly in the year 2020 as well as under the prior administration:

2020 was a uniquely uncertain and perilous year. Within the world of international trade, the steady increase in the use of sanctions and export controls—principally by the United States but also by jurisdictions around the world—proved to be a rare constant. In each of the last four years, our annual year-end Updates have chronicled a sharp rise in the use of sanctions promulgated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), as well as growing economic tensions between the United States and other major world powers. In the final tally, OFAC during President Donald Trump’s single term sanctioned more entities than it had under two-term President George W. Bush and almost as many as two-term President Barack Obama.

Given sanction increases, evolving international developments, and transition to a new administration, a 2021 review of OFAC sanctions list, the 50 percent rule, and recommended compliance considerations is in order.

The U.S. Treasury Office of Foreign Asset Control’s (OFAC’s) Fifty Percent Rule states that the property and interests in property of entities directly or indirectly owned 50 percent or more in the aggregate by one or more blocked persons are considered blocked. Application of this rule is how OFAC determines whether companies not appearing on the OFAC Sanctions SDN list are considered blocked due to being owned by companies or people who are on the SDN list.

Persons whose property and interest in property are blocked pursuant to an executive order or OFAC regulations are considered to have an interest in all property of any entity they own. This is true whether the ownership is individual or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, when the ownership share is a fifty percent or greater interest. For example, this means that if Person A (who is blocked on the OFAC SDN list) owns 50 percent of Company B, Company B is also blocked even if it is not on the SDN list. These entities that are blocked but not on the actual SDN list are often referred to as “shadow blocked” entities since they are technically blocked but do not show up on the SDN list. Even though they are not on the list, they are still considered blocked and US persons and entities are prohibited from doing business with them. This makes an OFAC screening search complex and challenging.

The Complexity of Ownership Interests  

The Treasury Department even urges caution in dealing with entities where ownership interests of sanctioned individuals is below fifty percent and warns that such non blocked entities may be subject to future sanctioned designations or enforcement activity. Adding to the risk and complexity of this situation is the fact that in recent years the US Treasury Department has increased regulatory enforcement of the Fifty Percent Rule.

Moreover, the Fifty Percent Rule presents complex compliance challenges because some entities that are majority owned by sanctioned individuals or entities are often owned via complex arrangements, shell companies or holding companies. In addition, ownership can cross jurisdiction which makes it difficult to confirm true ownership. 

As part of its enforcement efforts OFAC publishes a list of individuals and companies owned or controlled by, or acting on behalf of, targeted countries. OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN) also includes individuals, groups and entities including terrorists and drug traffickers as designated under programs that are not typically specific to a particular country. Collectively these individuals and entities are called Specially Designated Nationals, or SDNs. Their assets are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from doing business or otherwise dealing with them.

Four Suggestions for Enhancing OFAC Sanctions Compliance

Because OFAC sanctions are very broad, difficult to understand, and open to different interpretations, here are four suggestions for effectively managing potential OFAC sanction situations:

> Understand OFAC’s Sanctions Rules

Visit the U.S. Treasury’s OFAC website and read about noted sanctions, recent actions and the like. Many sanctions are specific to certain persons, countries or businesses. If understanding as many sanctions scenarios as possible seems difficult, then focus on entities most relevant to your organization. Additionally, OFAC publishes a comprehensive Frequently Asked Questions section and links to recent actions.

> Gather All Relevant Information Before Making Decisions

If an OFAC screening issue arises, seek additional information, current documentation, and clarification regarding a possible OFAC search match. It is important to have strong, current documentation to justify actions taken or not taken. OFAC’s SDN list is updated regularly so a timely search is also critical. Additionally, penalties for failing to abide by an OFAC regulation are significant. Entities should conduct thorough and appropriate research. Also, it will be important to have a comprehensive file of accurate information in order to justify decisions made, especially in the event that decisions are ultimately challenged. Criminal penalties include a fine of up to one million dollars and/or up to 20 years in prison for each violation. Civil penalties may include a fine of up to $55,000 for each violation. Other penalties for violations of OFAC regulations include seizure or forfeiture of goods involved.

> Take the Time to Make Compliant and Appropriate Assessments and Decisions

Take your time when dealing with a possible OFAC search match. Once you engage in a business transaction, your opportunity for due diligence has concluded along with the transaction. Time constraints are always an issue, and this is especially the case during the pandemic, but this is a scenario in which taking time with your documentation and evidence before engaging in the relevant transaction or business activity is of utmost importance. Additionally, OFAC has a good FAQ navigation resource on this topic. When additional information is needed, wait for the needed documentation, especially If your activities included a query of OFAC. If in doubt, always contact OFAC and explain your situation as thoroughly and clearly as possible.

> Consult with legal counsel with appropriate experience

If the above three recommendations do not facilitate a clear, actionable answer, or if significant questions remain that are best addressed in attorney client privileged conversations, legal counsel should be retained to help facilitate an appropriate decision. Doing so also protects conversations held pursuant to the attorney client and work product privileges from discovery in later civil or administrative proceedings.

In summary, it is important to understand the OFAC sanctions rules, understand what sanction or Specially Designated National (SDN) you are involved with, make appropriate and compliant assessments and decisions, and consult with legal counsel where appropriate.

About Joe Stefansky

About Joe Stefansky

Joe Stefansky specializes on capturing the business opportunity in complex problems, using technology to transform difficulty into efficiency. The CEO and founder of Streamline Verify specializes in solving compliance, legal and administrative issues through intuitively designed software that reduces costs and saves time.

Related Articles

Infographic: Breaking Down the Exclusion Numbers

April 6, 2017

Click Infographic To Enlarge Here are some interesting takeaways to note: Nurses are still the most excluded among healthcare professionals -- higher than any other group including personal care p...

OIG Exclusion Made EASY

February 9, 2016

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services established The Office of Inspector General (OIG) to carry out these basic functions: The identification and elimination of fraud, waste, and abuse ...

Important Things to Know About Self-Disclosure ...

December 22, 2015

The Self-Disclosure Protocol is an important step in dealing with excluded individuals in your organization. It’s a tool for healthcare providers to volunteer information and to resolve exclusion is...